PDA

View Full Version : New England with an Elph


gparr
May 22nd, 2008, 06:52 AM
Last week I took my new Canon SD1100 IS Elph camera with me to New England and gave it a thorough test run. Overall, it is one impressive camera, particularly when you consider what can be done with a camera the size of a deck of cards. Here are my reactions so far, though I’m just beginning to learn what it can and can’t do.

The most impressive thing I’ve learned so far it that it is extremely good at determining exposures in its primary automatic mode.
The lens is very sharp and captures details well.
Controls are easy to learn and intuitive.
The LCD display on the back is large and delivers an accurate view of what the image will look like.
You can place a Rule of Thirds grid on the display, which isn’t a big deal in terms of composition, but a big help in keeping the camera level/squared up to the subject.
In full sun, the display is relatively hard to read, but it has a brightness adjustment that I’ve yet to use, so it may not be as bad as I’ve experienced.
The viewfinder is essentially useless.
IS is a tremendous benefit, particularly when most of your shooting is done holding the camera out away from your body.
It does an excellent job of changing ISO settings in automatic mode.
Noise builds up rapidly at ISO 400 and higher.
It will easily blow out highlights in strong sun.
If you switch to “manual” mode and underexpose to control blown highlights, it will quickly start to introduce noise.
Noise is easily removed with noise-reduction software without damaging the image.
I did all of my shooting in the largest image size and superfine resolution.
A 4 GB SDHC card will hold in excess of 1,100 images in the largest mode.
The camera goes through rechargeable batteries like a kid eating candy. Get at least one additional battery if you want to shoot for very long. I’m sure a lot of it is powering the display.
Keep the wrist strap on your wrist because the finish is very smooth and the camera easily dropped.
Macro and digital macro modes are very good.
The flash is adequate at best.
AWB, pre-set, and custom white balance are very good.
Powerup and shutter lag are essentially non-factors.

gparr
May 22nd, 2008, 06:53 AM
Here are some sample shots, all hand held.

This is what’s called The Wedding Cake House in Kennebunk, ME shot at about 11:00 a.m. on a sunny day in automatic mode. Only a few minor spots on the white spires are blown out.
http://www.gparr.com/photos/albums/userpics/10001/weddingcake01.jpg

http://www.gparr.com/photos/albums/userpics/10001/weddingcake02.jpg

Two shots of a church steeple. The only adjustment was to bring down the highlights on the sun side of the steeple.
http://www.gparr.com/photos/albums/userpics/10001/mainesteeple01.jpg

http://www.gparr.com/photos/albums/userpics/10001/mainesteeple02.jpg

The quilt shot done in macro mode and the spring man shot done in digital macro mode.
http://www.gparr.com/photos/albums/userpics/10001/springman02.jpg

http://www.gparr.com/photos/albums/userpics/10001/quilt02.jpg

Handheld, macro mode, available light, noise reduction.
http://www.gparr.com/photos/albums/userpics/10001/bracelets01.jpg

Some landscape shots.
http://www.gparr.com/photos/albums/userpics/10001/coastpeople01.jpg

http://www.gparr.com/photos/albums/userpics/10001/maineboats01.jpg

http://www.gparr.com/photos/albums/userpics/10001/maineboats02.jpg

gparr
May 22nd, 2008, 06:56 AM
I am most curious to see what results Joey gets with the Nikon P&S, particularly to see what happens with noise in low light with high ISO settings.
Gary

MatsP
May 22nd, 2008, 06:59 AM
Looking at them here, I can't tell that they came from a P&S camera, that's for sure.

--
Mats

jjvannorman
May 22nd, 2008, 09:11 AM
While I'm still low on the learning curve here, I know the well trained eye goes a long way (something I'm trying to develop). I think a lot of folks here could dazzle your average user with the old Kodak-instamatic.

MatsP
May 22nd, 2008, 09:21 AM
While I'm still low on the learning curve here, I know the well trained eye goes a long way (something I'm trying to develop). I think a lot of folks here could dazzle your average user with the old Kodak-instamatic.

Sure, I'm sure that Gary would get better pictures than me out of ANY choice of cameras - the equipment is, after all, only taking the pictures you tell it to take.

But the results are still impressive when you consider that I can't tell if those pictures were taken with a $xxx camera or Gary's "semi-pro" DSLR that would set you back at least $1000.

--
Mats

lecter
May 22nd, 2008, 11:23 AM
nice overview Gary . . . .
Nice shots too....
For Web speciifc, not too many stressful an environment, this is a cracker of a camera.......
P&S is breathing and well.........
Rob