|
» Online Users: 29 |
| 0 members and 29 guests |
| No Members online |
| Most users ever online was 1483, June 20th, 2009 at 10:26 AM. |
|
 |
 |
April 8th, 2005
|
 |
" "
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 2,851
|
|
Not a word in a Year....
Amazing what a bit of in Camera technolgy can do to the manufacturers of add in software......
I cannot remember when I last used neatimage............ even on a 3200 ISO image....
Weird....
rob
|
April 8th, 2005
|
 |
Walking into the light
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 2,021
|
|
|
Re: Not a word in a Year....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lecter
Amazing what a bit of in Camera technolgy can do to the manufacturers of add in software......
I cannot remember when I last used neatimage............ even on a 3200 ISO image....
Weird....
rob
|
How true. I've hardly used NI at all since switching from the D60. I will say that I used it routinely before, but now only to save mistakes where I've badly underexposed something.
|
April 8th, 2005
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,145
|
|
|
Re: Not a word in a Year....
I just touched one up using the noise reduction in Adobe raw converter, and I don't need more than that.
__________________
Fred
|
April 8th, 2005
|
|
moo
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 84
|
|
|
Re: Not a word in a Year....
i've never used raw before but it doesnt' seem to want to open in PS CS. i installed the 2.4 update, is there something else i'm missing?
|
April 8th, 2005
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,145
|
|
|
Re: Not a word in a Year....
Didn't it show up in a not-so-obvious place? I expected it under filters, but I seem to recall it was tucked away elsewhere.
__________________
Fred
|
April 8th, 2005
|
|
Amateur Photographer
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 1,363
|
|
|
Re: Not a word in a Year....
The RAW filter goes in the folders with your other filters, IIRC. If you installed something from your camera manufacturer that's stealing the RAW files when they're opened from within PS, then you need to find that plugin and move it out of the PS filters folders to another safe place.
|
April 8th, 2005
|
|
moo
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 84
|
|
|
Re: Not a word in a Year....
hey thanks guys, i just installed it on a different computer and tried to open a raw file it works great now :-D one more new thing to learn about now!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jliechty
The RAW filter goes in the folders with your other filters, IIRC. If you installed something from your camera manufacturer that's stealing the RAW files when they're opened from within PS, then you need to find that plugin and move it out of the PS filters folders to another safe place.
|
|
April 11th, 2005
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 5,934
|
|
|
Re: Not a word in a Year....
I have wondered for a while what the future would hold for Noise Reduction programs as camera technology continues to improve in this regard. Regardless however, there will still be millions of pictures that have already been taken with noisier cameras.
|
April 11th, 2005
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,924
|
|
|
Re: Not a word in a Year....
Plus, for those who cannot afford the higher end cameras, like the 1DsMII and do not want to put themselves in more debt than they can assume, a noise reduction program can be of benefit in improving the quality of their output.
__________________
Without Wax,
Bob Gleason
Amateur, Not Professional
"Not Wanting to Change What I Am....Only What I Will Be."
www.rjgleason.com
|
April 11th, 2005
|
|
Amateur Photographer
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 1,363
|
|
|
Re: Not a word in a Year....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rjgleason
Plus, for those who cannot afford the higher end cameras, like the 1DsMII and do not want to put themselves in more debt than they can assume, a noise reduction program can be of benefit in improving the quality of their output.
|
Yep, but if the noise happens to be of a banded sort, sometimes the programs can have difficulty with it. Plus, I'd often rather live with a bit of noise than plastic-y smooth output with that "digital" look.
|
April 11th, 2005
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,924
|
|
|
Re: Not a word in a Year....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jliechty
Yep, but if the noise happens to be of a banded sort, sometimes the programs can have difficulty with it. Plus, I'd often rather live with a bit of noise than plastic-y smooth output with that "digital" look.
|
Agree, Jason......
__________________
Without Wax,
Bob Gleason
Amateur, Not Professional
"Not Wanting to Change What I Am....Only What I Will Be."
www.rjgleason.com
|
December 30th, 2006
|
|
" "
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 2,851
|
|
|
Re: Not a word in a Year....
Interestingly, since the 1D2 and 1Ds2, I've never touched noise reduction software. It's 2007 tomorrow, and I cannot see it happening ever again. Perhaps with the Phase One, but for low light photos I'd pull out a Canon (so to speak).
|
October 24th, 2007
|
|
" "
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 2,851
|
|
Interestingly . . .
With the advent of high ISO capability, these programs are regaining popularity. ISO 6400 in impossible conditions and a bit of neatimage...
just when you thought it was all dead!!
:-)
Rob
|
October 24th, 2007
|
 |
Golf and Photography hack
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 408
|
|
|
Re: Not a word in a Year....
I still use Noise Ninja on alot of my concert/club shots I process for the web. It reduces the noise from the 20D and I think what i really like is the sharpening feature too.
Of course, you'll rarely see a soft or blur type focus image from my work. Could be that I can achieve the same effect taking my glasses off. hahaha 
|
May 9th, 2008
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Oklahoma city
Posts: 785
|
|
|
Re: Not a word in a Year....
I still use noise ninja of course i also am still using my first dslr camera. It just grew on me. I know i could have traded in my rebel and my xt but why. I know how to use both of these cameras. and im able to get good quality shots. so why mess with it.
__________________
- board er ing on spectacular
- Mark Swartz
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
Location forum?
May 7th, 2005 10:18 PM
1 Day Ago 08:37 AM
27 Replies, 3,975 Views
|
|
|
|
» June 2013 |
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|
