|
» Online Users: 26 |
| 0 members and 26 guests |
| No Members online |
| Most users ever online was 1483, June 20th, 2009 at 10:26 AM. |
|
 |
 |
February 8th, 2004
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 5,934
|
|
|
Canon 1D Mark II vs. Canon 1DS Resolution
I'll be the first to admit that I'm not as technical as some on this forum. So please correct me if I'm wrong in this logic:
Assume you have a 1D Mark II and a 1DS
You're shooting with the same focal length at the same distance
You're shooting the same subject
1D mark II = 8 MP
1DS = 11 mp
1D Mark II has 1.3 "multiplier"
1DS has no multiplier
Assuming the 1d Mark II was a full frame shot, and you cropped the 1DS shot to achieve the identical framing, Tthe actual resolution of the usable image is pretty close. Obviously if you fill the frame with both cameras using differnt lenses this would not be the case.
|
February 8th, 2004
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 605
|
|
|
Re: Canon 1D Mark II vs. Canon 1DS Resolution
If the 1D2 was full frame it would have a 13.52 MP based on it being a 8 MP camera.
If the 1Ds was cropped in the case you described it would be 6.5 MP based on it being a an 11 MP camera. Pretty close but with the weaker AA the 1D may appear as if it had more info
Scott
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
 Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads |
Location forum?
May 7th, 2005 10:18 PM
16 Minutes Ago 05:27 PM
15 Replies, 3,537 Views
|
Malta
1 Week Ago 09:36 AM
1 Week Ago 09:36 AM
0 Replies, 105 Views
|
|
» May 2013 |
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| 28 | 29 | 30 |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
| 1 |
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 PM.
